Peter & Sons: game RTP by casino
4 games, at 4 of 58 casinos, average RTP 94.15%.
Same game, different casinos
RTP differs between casinos for 1 of 4 studio games — by 0.51 pp on average (about R$5.10 more per thousand R$1 bets), up to 2.04 pp at most.
| Game | Min | Max | Spread | Best casino |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greedy Alice | 94.00% | 96.04% | 2.04 | BANDBET |
| Barbarossa Revenge | 94.00% | 94.00% | 0.00 | 4PLAY |
| Alibi | 94.00% | 94.00% | 0.00 | 4PLAY |
| Potion Power | 94.00% | 94.00% | 0.00 | 4PLAY |
Where this studio’s games run higher
Coverage
4 of 58 casinos (7%) disclose RTP for Peter & Sons games.
Where it stands
Peter & Sons ranks 30 of 40 studios with published games, by number of games collected (4).
28 more studio games are in the catalogue, still without a three-casino comparison — outside this table.
About the studio
Peter & Sons is a game studio that develops casino games and certifies RTP configurations; each casino can select which available configuration to run. Our 2026-08-07 collection compares 4 Peter & Sons games across 4 of 49 licensed casinos.
One game, different casinos
Peter & Sons shows a measurable cross-casino RTP difference in 1 of the 4 comparable games. The average difference across the comparison set is 0.51, while the largest observed difference is 2.04.
Greedy Alice creates the full gap: its RTP ranges from 94.0 at 4PLAY to 96.04 at BANDBET. Barbarossa Revenge, Alibi and Potion Power each show 94.0 wherever they were compared, so the difference is concentrated in one game rather than spread across the catalogue.
A 0.51 RTP gap corresponds to R$5.1 per 1,000 R$1 spins in the dataset. The useful check is game-specific: for Peter & Sons, the casino can change the mathematics for Greedy Alice, but the compared versions of the other 3 games run at the same RTP.
Where casinos run it higher
For the Peter & Sons catalogue in this comparison, BANDBET records an average loss of 0.41 across 5 games and has 4 games at the maximum observed RTP. Its lower recorded loss is linked to the higher-RTP side of this studio-specific sample.
4PLAY records an average loss of 0.51 across 4 Peter & Sons games, with 3 at the maximum observed RTP. QGBET also records an average loss of 0.51 across 4 games and has 3 games at the maximum observed RTP.
These figures describe only the Peter & Sons games observed at BANDBET, 4PLAY and QGBET; they do not describe either casino's full game library or its RTP outside this studio. For Greedy Alice specifically, BANDBET is the observed maximum at 96.04 and 4PLAY is the observed minimum at 94.0.
How widely it shows up
Peter & Sons appears at 4 of 49 licensed casinos in the collection. That is limited coverage: only 4 casinos carry the studio's games at all, even though the comparison includes 4 games.
The sample is not thin under the stated 2-or-fewer threshold, but it remains narrow relative to the 49-casino market. There are only 4 casinos in which Peter & Sons RTP settings can be compared, so the result should be read as coverage of the observed catalogue rather than a market-wide availability claim.
For a reader checking availability, the practical figure is 4 of 49 licensed casinos. For a reader checking RTP consistency, the practical figure is 1 of 4 comparable Peter & Sons games with a casino-level difference.
Where it sits on the market
The observed average RTP for Peter & Sons is 94.15, compared with the market average RTP of 95.86. The observed Peter & Sons RTP range runs from 94.0 to 96.04.
The average alone does not determine whether individual Peter & Sons games are predictable across casinos. In this dataset, predictability depends on the title: 3 compared games remain at 94.0, while Greedy Alice changes between 94.0 and 96.04.
The useful comparison is therefore two-part: Peter & Sons averages 94.15 against a 95.86 market average, and 1 of its 4 comparable games has a cross-casino RTP difference. Those are separate measurements and should not be treated as the same result.
Frequent questions
01 Does Peter & Sons set the player's final RTP?
Peter & Sons develops the games and certifies RTP configurations, but the casino selects which configuration to run. In the observed Peter & Sons data, Greedy Alice runs at 96.04 at BANDBET and 94.0 at 4PLAY, showing that the casino selection can change the RTP used for a specific game.
02 Does a higher Peter & Sons average RTP mean better games?
No. The Peter & Sons average RTP of 94.15 is a catalogue-level observation, while RTP differences are game-level observations. A reader should separately check the game and casino combination: 3 compared games stay at 94.0, while Greedy Alice has a 2.04 difference.
03 Why does one Peter & Sons game have a different RTP across casinos?
A game can differ when casinos select different RTP configurations certified for that game. In this collection, Greedy Alice is the Peter & Sons title with a difference, ranging from 94.0 to 96.04; Barbarossa Revenge, Alibi and Potion Power each remain at 94.0 in their comparisons.
RTP is a long-run statistical average. Even at the highest figure on this list the mathematical edge stays with the house.