In brief
RTP Index compared readable public lobby figures for Bingo Iglu. AI.bet lists 96.56, while ENERGIA, GINGABET and QGBET each list 92.84. On a round stake of 1,000, that difference represents about 37 more returned on average at AI.bet’s published setting.
What happened
Game studios ship several RTP configurations, and each operator chooses the configuration it offers. That choice, rather than the Bingo Iglu title, accounts for the different published figures. AI.bet displays the higher figure, while ENERGIA, GINGABET and QGBET display the lower figure.
RTP Index reads each value from an operator’s public lobby before a session starts, as Brazilian rules require. It stores the value with the raw response, preserving the record visible to players. The comparison covers readable published figures; a missing figure is not evidence of a worse configuration.
How to check it yourself
Open an operator’s public lobby before starting a Bingo Iglu session. Search for the game and find the RTP beside its listing. Note the displayed percentage and the operator’s name, then repeat those steps in another public lobby. Compare the figures shown for the same game rather than assuming its title carries one universal setting.
What the RTP Index newsroom thinks
Our view: Bingo Iglu should be compared by operator, rather than described with one headline RTP. An operator’s disclosed configuration changes the game’s stated average return, so the lobby figure belongs in any meaningful comparison. Players looking across operators should give clear published figures real weight. That figure is attached to the version available before a player begins a session.
