In brief
JOGÃO, which is licensed in Brazil, recorded three RTP changes for Ocean King Jackpot. Every supplied entry names the same game. The recorded average change was -0.15 percentage points, reflecting the direction of the full sequence rather than a finding about JOGÃO’s wider catalogue.
Ocean King Jackpot moved from 97.0 to 96.56, returned to 97.0, and then moved back to 96.56. Each downward movement was -0.44 percentage points. The final recorded setting was therefore the lower of the two values seen in the supplied observations.
What happened
The observations came from JOGÃO’s own lobby before a game session began. That approach follows the cited Brazilian requirement for operators to display the relevant value before play. The source refers to clause 29 of Portaria SPA/MF one thousand two hundred and seven slash twenty twenty-four.
The record stores each published value with the raw response from which it was read. When the lobby displayed a changed value, the method created a new observation. It did not replace the earlier observation, so the captured order remains available for review.
The supplied sequence is down, up, then down for Ocean King Jackpot. It does not identify other game titles. The evidence therefore supports a finding of three recorded changes for one named game, rather than changes across three separately named games.
What this changes for players
The change concerns the RTP figure JOGÃO displayed for Ocean King Jackpot at the moment of each check. A player opening the lobby before starting a session could have encountered either recorded setting. The evidence does not establish how long either setting remained available.
An RTP value is a published game attribute, not a record of an individual result. These observations show that the lobby figure changed. They do not describe a player’s outcome, account balance, payment, or any action after a session began.
The stored sequence gives players and readers a way to distinguish a published lobby value from an assumption that the value stayed fixed. It does not establish whether a change affected any particular session, because the source only records the value shown before play.
What is known and what the source does not say
The known facts are limited to the values observed in JOGÃO’s lobby, their order, and the raw responses retained with them. Earlier observations are never overwritten. That preservation matters because it keeps the later display from erasing the earlier published value.
The source does not say why JOGÃO changed Ocean King Jackpot RTP. It gives no basis for attributing the movement to a technical update, a game configuration choice, a display issue, or another cause. Any explanation beyond the recorded lobby responses would be speculation.
The evidence also does not say whether Ocean King Jackpot was unavailable between checks or whether the same settings appeared elsewhere at JOGÃO. It makes no claim that JOGÃO hid information. The figures reflect what the operator published when each check took place.
What the RTP Index newsroom thinks
The useful finding is narrow: JOGÃO’s lobby displayed different RTP values for Ocean King Jackpot during the recorded window. The record also preserves the order in which those values appeared. That is enough to report a change in the published figure, and no more.
The wording around three changes should be read carefully because all supplied entries carry the Ocean King Jackpot name. Without separately named titles or additional records, the evidence should not be presented as proof of broader RTP movement across JOGÃO’s game catalogue.
The negative average is a compact description of this particular sequence. It is not evidence of motive, concealment, or a permanent change. Readers should treat the observations as time-specific records of what JOGÃO’s lobby showed before a session started.
