In brief
RTP Index compared Evil Eyes figures published by four operators. BETESPECIAL showed 97.2, FULLTBET showed 96.3, and PINNACLE and BOLSA DE APOSTA each showed 94.21. The game name is the same, but studios ship several RTP configurations and each operator selects the version it lists.
On a round stake of 100 units over the long run, the published gap represents 2.99 units in expected return. RTP describes a long-run average rather than the result of any individual session.
What happened
BETESPECIAL published the highest readable Evil Eyes RTP. PINNACLE and BOLSA DE APOSTA published the lowest readable figure, while FULLTBET sat between them. Players should check the percentage on the specific operator’s Evil Eyes listing because the title alone does not identify its configuration.
RTP Index read each figure from the public operator lobby before a session started and stored the raw response. Brazilian rules require this pre-session disclosure. The comparison covers operators that publish a readable RTP figure; silence is not evidence of a worse configuration.
How to check it yourself
Open the operator’s public lobby before starting a session and search for Evil Eyes. Open the game’s information panel, then find the percentage labelled RTP or return to player. Record the figure shown on that listing rather than relying on a casino-wide promotion.
Repeat the check in another operator’s public lobby. Compare the displayed Evil Eyes percentages directly, since a casino can list a different RTP configuration from another casino offering the same game.
What the RTP Index newsroom thinks
Our view is clear: treat Evil Eyes RTP as a property of an operator’s listing, not a fixed property of the game. When Evil Eyes is otherwise the same choice, the listing with the higher visible RTP offers the higher published long-run return.
A readable pre-session figure is the minimum for a useful comparison. It lets players compare the configuration actually offered before they decide where to play Evil Eyes.
