EN
Data verified on · last change
Pragmatic Play 10 casinos

Sweet Rush Bonanza RTP by casino

Highest RTP: BETBRA — 97%. Provider: Pragmatic Play. 10 casinos compared.

Best RTP right now 97.00% A Confirmed · verified 2026-08-13
Spread across the market
0.5 pp
House edge
3.0%
Volatility
not stated
DATA SHEET

Game specification

Certified RTP variants
96.50%
Observed range
96.50–97.00%
TOOL

Expected return calculator

This is a statistical expectation, not a session forecast.

Long-run expected return970.00House edge: 3.00%

Observed change history

No actual RTP changes recorded yet.

Confirm what you see

Send a screenshot of the in-game information window. The first report stays pending; level C requires two independent matching reports and moderation.

We remove EXIF. Check that the image contains no name, email or account balance.
01

RTP by operator

The disclosed spread is 0.5 percentage points. Most dated records show 96.5%, while FULLTBET supplies the only value between the endpoints at 96.74% on 2026-08-08. The comparison is confirmed by eight independently operated brands, rather than treating every dated row as a separate source. Repeat checks capture changes over time: BETBRA and FULLTBET both showed 96.5% on 2026-08-09 after their higher records.

One casino per row. If it lists several RTP configurations, the values appear side by side.

97.00%table max · 1 casino 2 operators list multiple configurations
Casino RTP configurations Confidence Latest check
A BETBRA
2 configurations
97.00% 96.50%
Confirmed by operator
2 configurations
96.74% 96.50%
Confirmed by operator
A 4PLAY
96.50%
Confirmed by operator
96.50%
Confirmed by operator
A H2 BET
96.50%
Confirmed by operator
96.50%
Confirmed by operator
96.50%
Confirmed by operator
96.50%
Confirmed by operator
A STAKE
96.50%
Confirmed by operator
96.50%
Confirmed by operator

The small bar shows where a value sits within this table’s range, not the absolute RTP.

02

Where we found this game

Observed in operator catalogues. This is a positive, non-exhaustive list: a missing casino may have a closed catalogue or one the collector does not recognise yet.

Brazil

  • 4PLAY game and RTP found
  • AVIÃOBET game found; RTP not read
  • BATEU BET game found; RTP not read
  • BET FALCONS game found; RTP not read
  • BET.BET game found; RTP not read
  • BETBOO game found; RTP not read
  • BLAZE game found; RTP not read
  • GERALBET game found; RTP not read
  • JONBET game found; RTP not read
  • MAXIMABET game and RTP found
  • MCGAMES game found; RTP not read
  • MULTIBET game found; RTP not read
  • ONABET game found; RTP not read
  • PAPIGAMES game found; RTP not read
  • STAKE game and RTP found
  • SUPREMABET game and RTP found
  • VERA game found; RTP not read

Ontario, Canada

  • 888 Casino game found; RTP not read
  • FanDuel Casino game found; RTP not read
03

What the difference means in money

1 000 bets of R$ 1
R$ 1 000 total amount staked
R$ 970 theoretical return at 97.00%
R$ 30 mathematical house edge, 3.00%

A 0.5 percentage-point gap changes the theoretical return by 0.5% of total stakes when both versions are compared over equal turnover. The calculation uses cumulative stakes, rather than the size of a deposit or account balance.

The 97.0% record allocates a larger theoretical share of stakes to player return than the 96.5% records. That difference scales with the total amount wagered, so repeated use of the same funds still adds to turnover.

FULLTBET’s 96.74% observation sits between the highest and lowest records. Its smaller gap from 97.0% produces a correspondingly smaller theoretical difference than comparing either endpoint with 96.5%.

04

Certified configurations of this game

The 96.5% setting is therefore the configuration directly supported by the certification data. It also matches the repeated operator records dated through 2026-08-13.

The data do not give configuration labels, feature settings or technical explanations for the higher observations. Those figures remain confidence level A operator disclosures, but they cannot be mapped to separately named certified versions from this dataset.

No volatility value is stated for Sweet Rush Bonanza in the supplied records. RTP does not reveal volatility by itself, so the 96.5%, 96.74% and 97.0% disclosures cannot establish how frequently or unevenly returns may occur.

05

How to check the RTP yourself

  1. 01

    Open Sweet Rush Bonanza through the licensed Brazilian operator you intend to use. Confirm that Pragmatic Play is named as the provider before comparing the disclosure.

  2. 02

    Find the game information, help screen or operator RTP page. Read the percentage attached specifically to Sweet Rush Bonanza rather than using a provider-wide figure.

  3. 03

    Compare the displayed RTP with the dated operator record. Give greater weight to a newer disclosure when the same operator has published different values on separate dates.

  4. 04

    Record the operator, RTP and date together. Recheck them after a catalogue update because BETBRA and FULLTBET demonstrate that a disclosed value can change.

06

Frequent questions

These questions address the changed records and the source count behind the comparison.

01 Is 97.0% the latest BETBRA disclosure?

No. BETBRA recorded 97.0% on 2026-08-06, but its later check showed 96.5% on 2026-08-09. The earlier figure remains the dataset’s maximum, while the later record is more recent.

02 Why does FULLTBET have two different RTP values?

FULLTBET showed 96.74% on 2026-08-08 and 96.5% on 2026-08-09. These are dated operator snapshots, so they document a change rather than proving that both values were available simultaneously.

03 Why are there eight independent sources despite repeated checks?

Repeated rows for the same operator are follow-up disclosures, not additional independent brands. The 4PLAY records also identify the same shared platform, so they do not create separate confirmations. The recognised source count remains eight independently operated brands.

Sweet Rush Bonanza is for people aged 18+ only.

RTP describes long-run mathematics and does not predict the result of a session. The house edge remains at every listed RTP, while short-term outcomes can differ sharply from the published percentage.

Set a spending limit before playing and treat every stake as money that may be lost. Stop when the limit is reached, and never use a higher RTP disclosure as a reason to recover previous losses.

RTP is a long-run statistical average. Even at the highest figure here the mathematical edge stays with the house.