EN
Data verified on · last change
Hacksaw 7 casinos

Eye of the Panda RTP by casino

Highest RTP: GINGABET — 96.26%. Provider: Hacksaw. 7 casinos compared.

Best RTP right now 96.26% A Confirmed · verified 2026-08-09
Spread across the market
2.1 pp
House edge
3.7%
Volatility
not stated
DATA SHEET

Game specification

Certified RTP variants
96.26% · 94.21% · 92.25% · 88.31%
Observed range
94.21–96.26%
TOOL

Expected return calculator

This is a statistical expectation, not a session forecast.

Long-run expected return962.60House edge: 3.74%

Observed change history

No actual RTP changes recorded yet.

Confirm what you see

Send a screenshot of the in-game information window. The first report stays pending; level C requires two independent matching reports and moderation.

We remove EXIF. Check that the image contains no name, email or account balance.
01

RTP by operator

The difference between the highest and lowest disclosed RTP is 2.05 percentage points. Most brands show 94.21%, while GINGABET and STAKE show 96.26%. FULLTBET is the exception because its records contain both 96.17% and 94.21%. Repeated records for STAKE, FULLTBET and BETBRA are updated disclosures, not additional independent confirmations. The comparison therefore covers seven independently operated brands rather than treating every row as a separate source. These disclosures come from licensed Brazilian operators and do not establish the available settings in another regulated market. The FULLTBET records disagree even on 6 August 2026, when both 96.17% and 94.21% were captured. Its later check on 9 August shows 94.21%. The data does not explain whether the earlier figure came from a different configuration, an update or a disclosure error.

One casino per row. If it lists several RTP configurations, the values appear side by side.

96.26%table max · 2 casinos 1 operator list multiple configurations
Casino RTP configurations Confidence Latest check
96.26%
Confirmed by operator
A STAKE
96.26%
Confirmed by operator
2 configurations
96.17% 94.21%
Confirmed by operator
A BETBRA
94.21%
Confirmed by operator
94.21%
Confirmed by operator
94.21%
Confirmed by operator
94.21%
Confirmed by operator

The small bar shows where a value sits within this table’s range, not the absolute RTP.

02

Where we found this game

Observed in operator catalogues. This is a positive, non-exhaustive list: a missing casino may have a closed catalogue or one the collector does not recognise yet.

Brazil

  • AVIÃOBET game found; RTP not read
  • BATEU BET game found; RTP not read
  • BET FALCONS game found; RTP not read
  • GINGABET game and RTP found
  • STAKE game and RTP found
  • VERA game found; RTP not read
03

What the difference means in money

1 000 bets of R$ 1
R$ 1 000 total amount staked
R$ 963 theoretical return at 96.26%
R$ 37 mathematical house edge, 3.74%

The 2.05-point gap means the published theoretical return differs by 2.05% of total turnover when comparing the highest and lowest settings. This is a percentage-point comparison, not a 2.05% relative increase on the lower RTP.

A lower RTP assigns a smaller theoretical share of turnover to player returns. The effect grows with cumulative wagering because the same percentage difference applies whenever turnover increases.

The calculation compares the disclosed settings while holding the amount wagered constant. It does not represent a cashback rate or predict the balance after an individual session.

04

Certified configurations of this game

Hacksaw lists certified Eye of the Panda configurations at 96.26%, 94.21%, 92.25% and 88.31%. The Brazilian operator checks found the first two settings, while no listed record shows 92.25% or 88.31%. Their certification does not prove that every operator currently offers them.

The 96.17% reading published by FULLTBET does not appear among the certified configurations supplied here. That mismatch should be checked against the RTP shown inside the live game before staking. No volatility rating was provided, so the RTP figures cannot establish how often or how unevenly returns may occur.

05

How to check the RTP yourself

  1. 01

    Open Eye of the Panda through the licensed Brazilian operator being checked. Confirm that the game information names Hacksaw before comparing its disclosure with these records.

  2. 02

    Open the information, help or paytable screen before placing a stake. Find the RTP attached to the active version rather than relying on a catalogue page or a provider-wide figure.

  3. 03

    Compare the displayed RTP with the certified settings of 96.26%, 94.21%, 92.25% and 88.31%. Treat a 96.17% display as a separate operator-published reading that needs further confirmation.

  4. 04

    Record the operator, displayed percentage and date of the check. Recheck after an update because FULLTBET moved between disclosed values, while STAKE and BETBRA had repeated verification dates.

06

Frequent questions

01 Which licensed Brazilian operators show the highest Eye of the Panda RTP?

GINGABET and STAKE show the highest disclosed RTP of 96.26%. GINGABET was verified on 9 August 2026, while STAKE was verified on 6 August and again on 9 August. All of these records carry confidence level A.

02 Why does FULLTBET have more than one RTP value?

FULLTBET has a 96.17% record and separate 94.21% records. Both values appeared on 6 August 2026, and 94.21% appeared again on 9 August. The available data confirms the disclosures but does not identify the reason for the disagreement.

03 Do these percentages apply to every Hacksaw game?

No. These figures belong only to Eye of the Panda and cannot be transferred to another Hacksaw title. Baccarat is listed at 98.9%, while Fist of Demolition is listed at 96.55%, showing that the provider catalogue does not use one shared RTP.

Eye of the Panda is for adults aged 18+. RTP describes long-run mathematics and cannot predict a single session, while the house edge always remains. Set spending and time limits before play, and never treat a higher disclosed RTP as guaranteed profit.

RTP is a long-run statistical average. Even at the highest figure here the mathematical edge stays with the house.